Writers should —
say what they mean and mean what they say
express things more by use of analogy
Well, it depends on the situation, right? For a novel, you'd want more description; for an article, they need to cut the crap.
Which is more admirable —
the ability to organize and be methodical
the ability to adapt and make do
I don't know!
Do you put more value on the —
definite
open-ended
I don't know!
Do you value in yourself more that you are —
unwavering
devoted
I'm neither unwavering, nor devoted.
Do you more often prefer the —
final and unalterable statement
tentative and preliminary statement
I don't know!
In relationships should most things be —
renegotiable
random and circumstantial
I don't know!
A third of the time, I don't know what they're talking about; the second third, it depends upon the situation; the rest I can answer fairly simply.
So I came up with INFP (the idealist), ISFP (the artist), and INTP (the thinker). Going backwards, I found profiles for all three and read to see which fit the best. Aspects of all fit me. I think the ISFP description personality fits best overall, but fails to cover everything.
Eh, fuckit.
My on-going dillema: trying to figure out what to do with my life.
posted by Newpeep, N.D. (neurotic depressive) @ 11:38 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home